🔗 Share this article

The decision by the DNC to withhold the publication of its own post-election analysis on the 2024 election is stunning yet not surprising. Resistant to unpleasant candor, the DNC operates more like a communications shop rather than a political organization focused on cultivating grassroots capacities to secure victories.

A Culture of Conformity

Reluctant to break with the prevailing attitude of conformity, the committee has continued under the Biden-Harris shadow throughout 2025. Releasing the findings might have shown that the leadership truly desire to foster honest conversation regarding the strategic failures that enabled the former president to win re-election. Yet, the leadership is moving forward as if there is little to understand from the tragic debacle of 2024.

"Here’s our North Star: does this help us win? If the answer is no, it is an unnecessary diversion from the core mission," a rationale that has been offered for withholding the report.

Critical Problems an Autopsy Would Have Explored

An autopsy report of substance would tackle head-on certain uncomfortable matters. Among them are:

• Electoral Disenchantment: Losing of a significant portion of the electorate who voted for the Democratic ticket in 2020 became a critical factor during the tight 2024 election.
• A Decision to Seek Re-election: The determined insistence by a party leader to seek re-election, coupled with a last-minute withdrawal, has been criticized as denying Democratic voters of a competitive nomination process.
• Losing Touch With Core Democratic Voters: Amid inflation, the electoral effort is criticized for accommodating elite contributors and not managing to confront the role of big business.
• A Foreign Policy Impact: The failure to reconsider a policy position on the situation in Gaza allegedly caused alienating many voters, especially with young people, Arab American communities, Muslim voters.
• Losing Young Voter Backing: Polling data demonstrates a significant decline in votes for the candidate among the youth electorate.

A Pattern Shunning Scrutiny

Choosing secrecy aligns with a longstanding habit of evading uncomfortable facts. It echoes an episode in which the vast majority of elected Democrat in Congress acquiesced to an incumbent's decision for seeking another term until a disastrous public debate performance compelled a change.

At the same time, a significant majority of the electorate had been consistently telling researchers that they did not want the incumbent to seek re-election.

Campaign Spending Questions

A thorough autopsy would also investigate questions regarding campaign spending, including what sums flowed to high-priced advisors and media firms during an electoral effort that burned through a staggering war chest over a few months.

The Broader Implication

Ultimately, the suppression regarding the analysis highlights a deference to the existing power structure that oversaw a disastrous electoral effort. The signal to the party's base – which includes countless dedicated activists – is that they cannot have a right to know the lessons party chiefs say they discovered based on a report compiled from feedback from all states.

An organization unable to honestly assess its mistakes is unlikely to escape the pattern which was so advantageous to the winning candidate.